Implications of @benwerd on Twitter DoS and single points of failure

The only model that makes sense is a distributed one: it’s a fundamentally harder problem to bring down a decentralized network, because there isn’t a single point of failure.

Ben’s got it about right (http://bit.ly/zn868). I have been thinking down these lines, too, “mesh networks, distributed databases and natural language processing”:
– More on the mesh
http://my-world.typepad.com/rworld/2007/10/more-on-the-mes.html

– Global justice and the future: Web 3.0 is the mesh
http://my-world.typepad.com/rworld/2007/09/global-justice-.html

In, “Can a PeopleWeb be built on restricted vocabularies?” (http://rworld2.brookesblogs.net/2009/07/12/can-a-peopleweb-be-built-on-restricted-vocabularies-andypowe11/) I suggest, “…the paradigm shift will be in two parts: a move away from restricted vocabularies *and* from centralised to distributed infrastructure.”

But the problem is one of power and control, isn’t it? How will resources be allocated to the development of networks that undermine the business models of all the current service providers?

I wish I had the technical competence to build even one small part of this vision.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.